Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 8 May 2002 10:41:04 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] gettimeofday time travels
Message-ID:	<20020508144104.GA1093@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<15547 DOT 16136 DOT 163472 DOT 840007 AT bea DOT com> <20020415214133 DOT GA19612 AT redhat DOT com> <15577 DOT 12319 DOT 622365 DOT 566799 AT bea DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<15577.12319.622365.566799@bea.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:03:11PM +0100, Philip Aston wrote:
>
>Hi Christopher,
>
>cgf writes on 15 Apr:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Philip Aston wrote:
> > >How about the attached quick and dirty fix?
> > 
> > I'm sorry but I don't think a quick and dirty fix is justified if
> > there are other alternatives. I haven't seen any other alternatives
> > discussed yet.
>
>No other alternatives have been proposed. I'm aware of a couple of
>other XEmacs'ers who are plagued by this (we love our uptime).
>
>I don't believe my patch to be dirtier than the implementation (no
>offence intended!). Please reconsider it.

Maybe mentioning the word "dirty" a few more times will get your
patch in.  Keep at it!

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -