delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Philip Aston" <paston AT bea DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-ID: | <15577.12319.622365.566799@bea.com> |
Date: | Wed, 8 May 2002 15:03:11 +0100 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gettimeofday time travels |
In-Reply-To: | <20020415214133.GA19612@redhat.com> |
References: | <15547 DOT 16136 DOT 163472 DOT 840007 AT bea DOT com> |
<20020415214133 DOT GA19612 AT redhat DOT com> |
Hi Christopher, cgf writes on 15 Apr: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Philip Aston wrote: > >How about the attached quick and dirty fix? > > I'm sorry but I don't think a quick and dirty fix is justified if > there are other alternatives. I haven't seen any other alternatives > discussed yet. No other alternatives have been proposed. I'm aware of a couple of other XEmacs'ers who are plagued by this (we love our uptime). I don't believe my patch to be dirtier than the implementation (no offence intended!). Please reconsider it. Thanks, - Phil -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |