Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CD6E41B.4060707@No.ece.Spam.gatech.Please.edu>
Date:	Mon, 06 May 2002 16:14:19 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT No DOT ece DOT Spam DOT gatech DOT Please DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	gmane.os.cygwin
To:	Glenn Randers-Pehrson <glennrp AT comcast DOT net>
CC:	perlspinr AT att DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: libpng changes...again. [Was: Re: I~M~-build tips Site corrections tobe made]
References:	<3CD6E1A2 DOT 39755B38 AT comcast DOT net>

Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:

> 
> I'm not removing pkgconfig/libpng.pc
> 
> I am merely adding bin/libpng-config for anyone who wants it.
> You are free to ignore libpng-config.


Yes, I just got finished reading the last two weeks of png-implement. 
(Next I'll start on the US Tax Code...<g>).  I misunderstood your 
earlier email; it sounded like png-config was going to *replace* 
pkg-config/libpng*.pc, which would definitely be a step backwards IMO. 
However, *adding* a png-config is not a bad idea at all; people seem to 
be more comfortable with scripting around those in client configure.in's 
for some reason.

As I said, I'm all better now.  Move along, nothin' to see here...

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -