Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 3 May 2002 08:07:41 +0200 (MEST)
From:	"S. L." <s_i_lao AT gmx DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	rebase (a) solution (?)[was: Problems starting apache, DLL base address conflicts?]
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated-Sender:	#0006551723 AT gmx DOT net
X-Authenticated-IP:	[194.102.244.61]
Message-ID:	<24409.1020406061@www35.gmx.net>
X-Flags:	0001

Stipe,
[...]
> > Any hope to shorten this last method ?!
> 
> Yep, do we (package contributors) have to rebase packages before
> tarballing them, or what's the standard way to do it?
[...]

No, I didn't mean that. What I was thinking, was if rebase couldn't actually
be included in cygwin distro, and to eventually add its step as a option to
autobuild (conf/make) stuff.

SLao

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -