delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/05/02/22:14:13

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-WM-Posted-At: avacado.atomice.net; Fri, 3 May 02 03:16:43 +0100
Message-ID: <004201c1f248$91711940$0100a8c0@advent02>
From: "Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20020502045844 DOT GA32468 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: New snapshot with significant new functionality
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 03:16:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

> If you do have problems, report them *here*.  Don't send me private
> email.  Don't send email to ChrisJ.  Don't send mail to cygwin-apps,
> cygwin-announce, or cygwin-developers (unless you actually are
> subscribed and want to talk about the implementation).  If you think the
> code should be patched, don't send mail to cygwin-patches unless you
> actually have a patch to submit.
Chris, I see you have made the fhandler_virtual, etc. functions use vanilla
path_conv instead of normalized_path or whatever I called it originally.
This relies on path_conv::check returning the normalised posix path instead
of the native path as it usually does. However this breaks stuff like mkdir
/proc badly (in this case, a directory called 'proc' gets created in the
root of C:\). The fix is to go back to using the normalised path explicitly
(i.e. replacing pc with pc.normalized_path) in fhandler_virtual.cc, etc. and
removing the strcpy (path, path_copy) line from path.cc.
Since I have some free time tommorrow I will try to make a patch for this
and some of the other outstanding bugs I know about.
I also need an opinion on how the directory /proc should be treated.
Either:
    i) a real directory called /proc hides the virtual directory /proc
completely
    ii) the virtual directory /proc hides the real directory /proc
completely (other than showing up in a directory listing of /)
    iii) the virtual directory /proc inherits the permissions and ownership
of the real directory /proc if it exists
    iv) the virtual directory /proc is only accessible if there exists a
real directory /proc (combined with one of the above)

Regards
Chris



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019