Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 2 May 2002 20:30:40 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: New snapshot with significant new functionality
Message-ID:	<20020503003040.GA712@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020502163048 DOT 026f8bb0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <00ea01c1f237$8c421a70$0100a8c0 AT advent02>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<00ea01c1f237$8c421a70$0100a8c0@advent02>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:14:52AM +0100, Chris January wrote:
>> Chris & Chris,
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>> Is the registry as reflected in /proc/registry writable?
>I'm torn between writing "no", and "no, not yet".
>The problem with this is that it is inevitable that at some point or other
>someone will post to the cygwin mailing list complaining they typed rm -rf
>/proc/registry/* and now their system is hosed and it's all Red Hat's
>fault...

Yeah, I'd be waiting for that.

Right now, I'm waiting for the first "I upgraded cygwin and now my /proc
directory has strange stuff in it!" message.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -