Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/04/25/01:27:29
You're right, I wasn't thinking, if an exception isn't caught before it
leaves main it aborts the program.
So maybe codewarrior has a bug!
Mike
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 06:33, Lassi A. Tuura wrote:
> > That shouldn't matter. At the worst it should mean that the exception is not
> > caught by any of the catch clauses given, so the "return 0" would be taken.
>
> It does matter -- in this case the exception was not handled, and
> therefore terminate() gets called, which probably called abort(). That
> is, the "return 0" is never taken, the exception leaks outside main().
>
> //lat
> --
> Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when
> he sticks his neck out. --James Bryant Conant
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
--
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
crawford AT goingware DOT com
http://www.goingware.com/
Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -