Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP?
X-No-Archive:	Y
X-Home-Page:	http://www.geocities.com/coalition_for_national_day_care
References:	<3CC35E3B DOT 3060306 AT goingware DOT com>
From:	Elizabeth Barham <soggytrousers AT yahoo DOT com>
Date:	21 Apr 2002 20:04:57 -0500
In-Reply-To:	"Michael D. Crawford"'s message of "Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:50:03 -0500"
Message-ID:	<87n0vwlf0m.fsf@liliwhite.renaissance.oasis>
Lines:	49

This whole thing seems kind of iffy in regards to Microsoft's
position. While Microsoft has some authority, consumers do too and
Windows XP's EULA may violate some consumer rights (I don't know of
any off hand, though). But even if it doesn't violate any at the
moment, it violates what I consider my own "consumer rights" - I have
the right to run any program I want to on any computer I own,
including Microsoft Operating Systems.

And what is this EULA anyway? If I purchase software, do I or do I not
own the software? And can I or can I not do anything I want to with it
- I mean, it's mine and they sold it to me. Or am I "leasing" the
software from someone?

It's one thing for an EULA to say, "You may have one copy of this
piece of software running on at most one computer at any time," but
another thing for it to say what I can use the software for.

Elizabeth

"Michael D. Crawford" <crawford AT goingware DOT com> writes:

> Another issue is the number of clients served by a windows host
> running cygwin.
>   I remember that was an issue for O'Reilly for the web server they
> used to sell for Windows - non-server versions of Windows were only
> licensed to serve a few clients of any sort, and server versions of
> windows that could have any number of users came bundled with IIS, so
> O'Reilly was unable to sell to people who already had a bundled web
> server.
> 
> If somebody's running cygwin on a machine that's only licensed as a
> desktop version of windows, and they have a lot of clients for apache,
> postgresql, ssh or whatnot, they're likely in violation of the windows
> license.
> 
> I couldn't say whether the cygwin developers could be held liable by
> microsoft for not enforcing the desktop client limit.
> 
> Michael D. Crawford GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and
> Consulting http://www.goingware.com/ crawford AT goingware DOT com
> 
>      Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -