delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/04/21/07:36:16

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 04:40:49 -0700
From: Bruce Williams <brucewms AT pacbell DOT net>
Subject: RE: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP?
In-reply-to: <3CC24897.10238.884BE175@localhost>
To: dwyatt AT sunflower DOT com
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-to: brucewms AT pacbell DOT net
Message-id: <001a01c1e929$65a2bee0$d9ddfea9@faqserv.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf
> Of Doug Wyatt
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:05 AM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP?
>
>
>
>
> > You wrote in <4471243492 DOT 20020421095401 AT familiehaase DOT de>
> > in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:54:01 +0200:
> >
> > > > Microsoft's XP license agreement says, "Except as
> otherwise permitted
> > > > by the NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote
> Desktop features
> > > > described below, you may not use the Product to permit
> any Device to
> > > > use, access, display, or run other executable software
> residing on the
> > > > Workstation Computer, nor may you permit any Device to
> use, access,
> > > > display, or run the Product or Product's user
> interface, unless the Device
> > > > has a separate license for the Product."
> > >
> > > > That means using any software other than Microsoft's to
> view an XP
> > > > desktop from Windows 2000 or any other operating system
> would violate
> > > > the company's license agreement, in case you care.
> > >
> > > That is not correct, you can use whatever software you
> want to as long
> > > as your 'Device' has a XP license.
> >
> > I've not read the full licence for XP but this passage taken alone
> > would suggest that you need an extra licence for a monitor.
> After all,
> > it's a separate device that displays the software and the UI. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Sam Edge
> >
> Or, Web servers which download Java, Javascript and ASP's.
>
> What concerns me is the the apparent stricture on any non-MS
> remote access to one's own PC via sshd!  I guess this would
> even make PCAnywhere connections from a non-XP host illegal
> w/o an additional XP license.
>
> Doug

How about a "Device" - Linux/Apache server "using and accessing"
Netscape/Mozilla and -horrors- using the "user interface"?

But, wait - I know what this is about - it is about INNOVATION!

The Microsoft legal department has come up with the perfect legal firewall!
Why have us tech people deal with security issues, when there are thousands
of hungry lawyers available? Hacking is in violation of the license!

Bruce Williams

Microsoft is sort of a mixture between the Borg and the
Ferengi. Combine the Borg marketing with Ferengi networking...
                                        [Andre Beck in dcouln]



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019