Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: Copy-on-write fork
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:02:42 +1000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5E92@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3K34s902044

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris January [mailto:chris AT atomice DOT net] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:07 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Copy-on-write fork
> 
> 
> This is mainly a question aimed at Christopher Faylor, but 
> maybe someone else knows the answer. My question is, with 
> regard to Chris's post "Re: copy-on-write (oh well)" 
> [http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2000-07/msg00026.h
> tml], does anyone know why a copy-on-write implementation of 
> fork takes longer than the current Cygwin version?? 

What would be interesting would be to closely monitor the relevant
perfmon items and see if you can determine the thing causing the delay.
You'd probably need a custom program to get enough detail though :[.

Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -