Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/04/13/00:44:30
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Howe [mailto:howe AT carcass DOT dhs DOT org]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:37 PM
> > Since I can't see any reason for the error, I assume that
> the source
> > has been locally modified or the header files are screwed up.
> None of these. Why don't you try yourself ?
>
> > Basically, it seems to me that if you can't solve simple
> things like
> > basic compilation errors, you probably shouldn't be building cygwin
> > from scratch.
> And also you should do a working snapshot instead of
> being arrogant.
Do you think through what you are writing before you write it? How do
you think the binary snapshots get created? If the snapshot won't build,
neither source nor binary are made available on the web pages.
> You you were so darn smart as you think the
> snapshot would be working. I just have thousands of other
> things to do instead of making the software YOU develop work.
It works quite fine for several thousand other users thank you very
much. Is *your* install working correctly? I don't know, and given the
attitude you portray in the email I'm replying to - I don't care. Chris
has, on occasion, been somewhat tough, but has also on those occasions
apologised. In this case I think he has been helpful, direct and
responsive, and you are being - dare I say it - abusive in return.
Hardly the way to get what *YOU* want is it?
> I guessed that could be a known flaw so I decided to ask
> fisrt before trying to solve it myself.
And you got an answer - It's not a known flaw. Wht's your problem?
> If you can't help then just shutup instead.
Chris did help. I really cannot grasp why you are reacting in the manner
you have.
<cut seriously offensive question>
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -