Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<200204121531.BAA27343@cts01.webone.com.au>
From:	Rasjid Wilcox <rasjidw AT bigpond DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Invalid 'requires:' entries in setup.ini (timestamp 1018417804)
Date:	Sat, 13 Apr 2002 01:31:22 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0

I'm unclear about whether the 'requires' field in the setup.ini file is 
currently in use.  Nevertheless, there are currently two inconsistencies.

Package 'gcc' requires non-existent package 'mingw'
Package 'keychain' requires non-existent package 'ssh'

These should presumably be 'mingw-runtime' and 'openssh' respectively.

I discovered this while testing a small (166 line) python library I have 
written for parsing the setup.ini file.  It's main use is to work out 
dependencies of packages, but (as part of its self-test) it also checks for 
inconsistencies in the 'requires' field.

I'd be happy to send a copy of it to either the list or individuals, if 
anyone is interested.

Please CC me in any replys, as I'm not subscribed to the list.

Rasjid.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -