Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
Path:	not-for-mail
From:	"Steve Howe" <howe AT carcass DOT dhs DOT org>
Newsgroups:	gmane.os.cygwin
Subject:	Re: Error compiling cygwin-snapshot-20020409-1
Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:37:08 -0300
Lines:	41
Message-ID:	<a96dc2$afj$1@main.gmane.org>
References:	<a92boa$bg7$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <1821028679 DOT 20020411101028 AT syntrex DOT com> <20020411143727 DOT GB5214 AT redhat DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cm-net-cwb-c8b031bd.brdterra.com.br
X-Trace:	main.gmane.org 1018607812 10739 200.176.49.189 (12 Apr 2002 10:36:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:36:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote in message
news:20020411143727 DOT GB5214 AT redhat DOT com...
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:10:28AM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> >Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 11:44:44 PM, you wrote:
> >> In file included from cygheap.cc:17:
> >SH> fhandler.h: In method `select_stuff::select_stuff()':
> >SH> fhandler.h:1089: implicit declaration of function `int memset(...)'
> >SH> make: *** [cygheap.o] Error 1
> >
> >Obviously, this source file calls memset without including the
> >approapriate header file (string.h).
>
> Not so obvious at all.  How do you suppose I could generate a snapshot
> if that was true?
>
> >I don't have the latest CVS sources to verify this - what I've stated
> >above is just and assumption based on the gcc error message.
>
> If you can't check the source, why are you responding?
>
> Since I can't see any reason for the error, I assume that the source
> has been locally modified or the header files are screwed up.
None of these. Why don't you try yourself ?

> Basically, it seems to me that if you can't solve simple things like
> basic compilation errors, you probably shouldn't be building cygwin
> from scratch.
And you probably don't know know anything about me to say that.
And also you should do a working snapshot instead of being arrogant. You you
were so darn smart as you think the snapshot would be working. I just have
thousands of other things to do instead of making the software YOU develop
work. I guessed that could be a known flaw so I decided to ask fisrt before
trying to solve it myself.
If you can't help then just shutup instead. Do you have an orgasm when you
write those things ?

Howe






--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -