Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<000b01c1e206$2a53ca20$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk>
Reply-To:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
From:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject:	RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4
Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:40:39 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Yes: I think it must be inconsistencies in the version numbering that have
caused this. I found a recent setup.ini and compared it with the current
version:

Comparing files setup.ini and setup.old

****** setup.ini
setup-timestamp: 1018593006
setup-version: 2.194.2.24
****** setup.old
setup-timestamp: 1018572604
setup-version: 2.194.2.22
******

****** setup.ini
version: beta-20001218-4
****** setup.old
version: 20001218-4
******

Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -