Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<000901c1e1f9$6ed8e8e0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk>
Reply-To:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
From:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject:	RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4
Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:09:56 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

I know you (Robert) have not got a W98 machine. I've tried as much
investigation at this end as I can. I've tried all combinations of v.22 /
v.24 here, with / without using setup.ini at all, and editing setup.ini when
used to refer to v.22 / v.24 accordingly. There is nothing obvious that I
can see.

Except possible inconsistencies in the version number. Is it
"beta-20011218-4" or "20011218-4"? The screen (that usually says "Keep") has
Current = 20011218-4 and New = beta-20011218-4.

(However, this wouldn't explain why v.22 did not exhibit the repeated
instruction to download a further copy of tetex-beta, that is now exhibited
in v.24. Would it? Or maybe the @tetex-beta paragraph in setup.ini has also
recently been altered.)

Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -