Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: MS Logo compliance - w2k / xp
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:56:04 -0400
Message-ID:	<7BFCE5F1EF28D64198522688F5449D5A0AA2C6@xchangeserver2.storigen.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Scott Prive" <Scott DOT Prive AT storigen DOT com>
To:	<John DOT Lonergan AT ubsw DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g38LueP27883

>I'm being asked if Cygwin is or will be 'MS Logo' compliant..
[snip]

-
You already have some responses to this, but here's one, from a different slant:


*Why* are you being asked this?

(Don't answer me! :-)  I don't want to know, since I can't help).

Questions sometimes can be leading; this question may indicate a more subtle issue, which is your real concern.

For example, this question could be from a manager who isn't very technical, but could have been exposed to some of Microsoft's anti-free software FUD in the mainstream press. So he/she has (unfounded) but legitimate "concerns" about using free software.

If this were the case, I'd consult some advocacy how-to's. Of course this might not be the issue either.

Good luck on this one.

-Scott






--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -