Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B21C4@wilber.adroit.com>
From:	"Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: ip.h & tcp.h
Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:57:31 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0

  Well, I'm somewhat to blame for this situation.
   See  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-09/msg00010.html

 Is the suggestion of "include <winsock.h>" reasonable?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:50 AM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: ip.h & tcp.h
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:34:42PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
> >Um, no one willing to answer?
> >
> >OK, I am changing my request now. CAN CYGWIN DROP IP.H AND TCP.H IN
> >DISTRIBUTION FOR NOW?
> 
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg01461.html
> 
> http://cygwin.com/contrib.html
> 
> cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -