Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/04/04/10:59:32
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> writes:
>
>>By the way, are you using the latest setup.exe from Cygwin? Setup.exe
>>should never suggest to downgrade, I think.
>>
>
>Found the answer in the README that comes with setup: it's still a
>TODO item:
>
> TODO
> [..]
> * Don't downgrade if the curr version is <= installed?
>
>Btw, this should apply to test too, I think.
>
I agree. It's annoying at best to install a group of test packages and
then, the next time I run setup, if I don't watch carefully they would
revert to the current.
An obvious problem is having everyone use a revision-level scheme that
tests correctly. I see at least two very different schemes here.
Also, setup would need to parse, e.g. 1.9-3 so that it's less than
1.10-1. I'll have to do a more thorough survey to see if a simple
minded algorithm would catch all the cases.
>
>
>Jan.
>
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -