Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:43:34 +0000
Message-ID:	<3691-Fri29Mar2002114335+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Jonathan Wilson <jonwil AT tpgi DOT com DOT au>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	cygqwin with mingw32 question
Newsgroups:	gmane.os.cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<3CA43322.5020508@tpgi.com.au>
References:	<3CA43322 DOT 5020508 AT tpgi DOT com DOT au>

On Friday 29 Mar 02, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> I am going to be doing something thats going to use cygwin, -mno-cygwin 
> and mingw32 and I need to know what compiler flags I can use to test for 
> this.
> This same code already builds on win32 with visual C++ and also on *nix 
> with gcc so is there a set of tests I can do to say "#ifdef _WIN32 && 
> _GCC" or something like that?

There is an entry in the "Programming Questions" section of the FAQ.
The question itself is rather badly worded, but I leave finding it as
an exercise for the reader.  If you have to read every entry in that
section, I would say that's a good thing.

BTW, if I can improve that entry, let me know.  It was written quite
some time ago.

Cheers,
David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -