Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Richard Hitt <rbh00 AT earthlink DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: stacktrace from withn an exec upon error condition
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:46:52 -0800
Reply-To:	rbh00 AT earthlink DOT net
Message-ID:	<lbl7au045j68jsp1fe1bqki052s87a8er4@4ax.com>
References:	<a7v9eh$1ph$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20020328153930 DOT GF11781 AT redhat DOT com> <a7vgnr$b9q$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20020328221751 DOT GK16757 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20020328221751.GK16757@redhat.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2T2eGX13262

Is it unreasonable to find appalling the suggestion to use an
undocumented function?

Richard

On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:17:51 -0500, you wrote:

>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:44:27AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
>>where does cygwin_stackdump() live?
>>I searched through the entire cygwin inst tree, but couldn't find any header
>>where it is defined.
>>
>>If it is a function I just invoke, where does it write the trace dump to?
>>stdout? stderr?
>
>I suggest that you write a simple test file and run it.  That would
>probably answer all of your questions.
>
>cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -