Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20020328123628.024baef8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:39:26 -0500
To:	Herve Bailly <herve DOT bailly AT sacet DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Time function implementations for cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<3CA35209.DF78CD8D@sacet.com>
References:	<3CA325D4 DOT E284A9F4 AT sacet DOT com>
	<20020328153817 DOT GE11781 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2SHgO505596

I think it's fair to say that things that are missing are usually not 
implemented because no one has contributed them.  If you're interested,
feel free to take a crack at the functions you require and contribute
them.

Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX



At 12:25 PM 3/28/2002, Herve Bailly wrote:
>                     Hello,
>     My question was bad asked. Time functions are very usefull for my
>application. And I would like to know if time functions are not implemented
>because of unsovable problems with Windows or if they will  be implemented
>in a near feature.
>     Thank you for any response.
>     Herve BAILLY
>
>Christopher Faylor a écrit :
>
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Herve Bailly wrote:
> > >I would like to know if functions like "clock_gettime", "clock_getres",
> > >"nanosleep", time_out for "select" or "sem_wait" functions, are
> > >implemented in CYGWIN.
> >
> > This is your second message on the subject.  It's easy enough to figure
> > this out for yourself.  Why do you need someone to tell you yes or no?
> >
> > For the record, clock_*, nanosleep, and time-out are not implemented.
> >
> > cgf
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -