Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CA35209.DF78CD8D@sacet.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:25:29 +0100
From:	Herve Bailly <herve DOT bailly AT sacet DOT com>
Organization:	SACET
X-Accept-Language:	fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Time function implementations for cygwin
References:	<3CA325D4 DOT E284A9F4 AT sacet DOT com> <20020328153817 DOT GE11781 AT redhat DOT com>

                    Hello,
    My question was bad asked. Time functions are very usefull for my
application. And I would like to know if time functions are not implemented
because of unsovable problems with Windows or if they will  be implemented
in a near feature.
    Thank you for any response.
    Herve BAILLY

Christopher Faylor a écrit :

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Herve Bailly wrote:
> >I would like to know if functions like "clock_gettime", "clock_getres",
> >"nanosleep", time_out for "select" or "sem_wait" functions, are
> >implemented in CYGWIN.
>
> This is your second message on the subject.  It's easy enough to figure
> this out for yourself.  Why do you need someone to tell you yes or no?
>
> For the record, clock_*, nanosleep, and time-out are not implemented.
>
> cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -