Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C986BFF.3B2B4CF2@lapo.it>
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:01:19 +0100
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Mailing List: CygWin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: RFP: NASM
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014C6B AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <00c501c1cfde$69741870$6401a8c0 AT apprentice>

> *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a
> hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)

I see they're distributing a .tar.gz with some cygwin utility (cvs.exe,
cyggdbm.dll, cygwin1.dll, cygz.dll, ssh*.exe; of course withour sources) so
they indeed know of cygwin existence, but of course they didn't suppose that
being an "official package" was so easy... I think the best think is to
contact them to ask if they want to mantain NASM package themself and
moreover politely pointing out that they should point to the setup instead
of having a tarball with some utilities packaged...
who volunteers? 0=)

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -