delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/03/19/05:56:36

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:44:22 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: CYGWIN variable: impact of options under Win9x
Message-ID: <20020319114422.R29574@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20020319072228 DOT D355239407D AT fastmail DOT fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20020319072228.D355239407D@fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 07:22:28AM +0000, Soren Andersen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am hoping that I'll get some helpful hints by posting this. I've been
> running Cygwin under Win98SE for months now without the CYGWIN env
> variable set in Windows at all. I have FAT and FAT32 partitions. My
> mounts are all binmode. Now I am looking at setting CYGWIN thus:
> 
> SET CYGWIN=export noenvcache glob:ignorecase title nostrip_title
> winsymlinks tty
> 
> What sort of surprises or changes in behavior (that I might not have
> realized were changeable behavior, i.e. things that I'd not taken heed
> of until now) might I experience?
> 
> Since this is the Cygwin List rather than another and its character is
> what it is, I'll type out explicitly that: I am posting this because I
> have a feeling of less than perfect comprehension of the uses and
> ramifications of the parameters to CYGWIN, even after reading
> http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html.

A refinement of your question would be nice.  I can't believe that
you don't understand *all* of the above options.  Which one are you
unsure about?  The only dangerous one AFAICS is 'tty' which changes
the way the console is handled.  Impact is that native Win32 console
apps could show some surprising effects.

> I am also keen on assuring myself that not mentioning "ntea" or "ntsec"
> is fine; that those options would do nothing under Win98 anyway, and

These are NT options.  Forget them on 9x/Me.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019