delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: Setup.exe release-candidate |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
Date: | Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:01:00 +1100 |
Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76062C3@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
Thread-Topic: | Setup.exe release-candidate |
Thread-Index: | AcHMKOXlU7ZoPFkMS+S5WOfG5eSeyQAABKyQ |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2FE2A102447 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net [mailto:fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net] > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:54 AM > If those of > us who need to keep a local copy of the current setup.exe > v.2.125.2.10, is there any reason why it shouldn't work with > future setup.ini's, even after [if] you release this version > v.2.194.2.11, or something close to it, as standard? Fergus Yes. Firstly, there are plans to move functionality out of setup.exe into packages where it can be more easily maintained. This includes things like /etc/passwd creations, /etc/profile creation.. you get the drift. Secondly not all enhancements and extensions to setup.ini and the package format will be backwards compatible. Given that this is a volunteer operation, I can *guarantee* that we won't be jumping through hoops to retain backwards compatability. We will likely have staggered changes - i.e. introduce the capability a revision before the change occurs - but that won't help you... If you are able to run gdb, you are able to help me debug this though. So, if you'd like to be able to move with the rest of us.... Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |