delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/03/11/12:03:02

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <011301c1c91a$9944f350$42a18c09@wdg.uk.ibm.com>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <001301c1c90d$00d1ecc0$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk>
Subject: Re: Setting and using a password in W98
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:34:21 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2002 16:34:22.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[9944F350:01C1C91A]

> Q3. Could the contents of c:\Cygwin\cygwin.bat be "officially" tweaked to
> c:\Cygwin\bin\login in order to gain the password-protection that is not
> conferred by the current contents of c:\Cygwin\cygwin.bat, or would this
> change simply induce other, different, equally bad consequences?!
> Fergus

Well, I think bad consequence number 1 would be to give a false sense of
security. (Not to mention having an unneccessary login process running).

Max.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019