Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Stephano Mariani" <sk DOT mail AT btinternet DOT com>
To:	"'Dockeen'" <dockeen AT mchsi DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: GCC 3.0.X and Cygwin
Date:	Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:10:33 -0000
Message-ID:	<001b01c1c7e1$278ee610$8047a8c0@sknet01>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
In-Reply-To:	<NCBBLKKJGBJOLDFMCKFPCEBMCAAA.dockeen@mchsi.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance:	Normal

Read the list archives. :)

If you need 3.x, build it yourself.

Stephano Mariani


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On
Behalf
> Of Dockeen
> Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2002 3:6 AM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: GCC 3.0.X and Cygwin
> 
> Is there a reason why base Cygwin still uses 2.95.3 of
> gcc, other than you have about 50 x 10^9 other
> more important things to do than deal with the
> 3 series. Is it somehow a poor match or messes
> things up for Cygwin?
> 
> Thanks,
> Wayne Keen
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -