delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | yes |
Path: | not-for-mail |
From: | Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | gmane.os.cygwin |
Subject: | Re: login: no shell: /bin/bash: Permission denied |
Date: | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 15:03:02 -0800 |
Organization: | Salira Optical Networks |
Lines: | 20 |
Message-ID: | <3C86A026.6080204@DeFaria.com> |
References: | <m3eliylhc2 DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <20020306101433 DOT P13590 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C866A0B DOT 6040500 AT DeFaria DOT com> <20020306213202 DOT C13590 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C869077 DOT 3090705 AT DeFaria DOT com> <3C86961C DOT 5040209 AT cportcorp DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 206.184.204.2 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | quimby2.netfonds.no 1015456215 9823 206.184.204.2 (6 Mar 2002 23:10:15 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT quimby2 DOT netfonds DOT no |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 6 Mar 2002 23:10:15 GMT |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 |
X-Accept-Language: | en-us |
Peter Buckley wrote: > >> Regardless, to me it's still would be a large security hole if all one >> needs to do is: >> >> $ echo "+" > ~/.rhosts >> >> to be able to abuse rsh to do something under somebody else's user ID >> is it not? > > rsh is inherently insecure. Attempts to make it secure are not > worthwhile (in fact, they tend to break rsh). Especially in the land of > NT insecurity, trying to make rsh secure simply makes it unusable. What are you talking about?!? It's simple, if rsh is called with the -l parameter (assuming the it's not -l <current user>) then prompt for a password. If that's not doable then fail with an error message of some sort. But lord's sakes laddy! Don't just let them walk in! :-) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |