delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/03/06/12:38:10

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <134651813.1015436268986.JavaMail.root@boots>
Date: 06 Mar 2002 12:28:39 -0000
From: "Bob Heckel" <fgi6vbcc1tcd001 AT sneakemail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Blind carbon copy not blind (mutt ssmtp)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

I've noticed unusual behavior using Cygwin 
mutt-1.2.5i-6 and ssmtp-2.38.7-3 that doesn't 
occur in standard Unix mutt/sendmail usage.

If I Bcc: someone, the entire Bcc: line 
appears buried in the headers of the
recipient's email (and of course the blind  
recipients are not hidden, just made harder
to find).  Is this a problem with the way
ssmtp is passing Bcc: addresses to my ISP's
(AT&T) SMTP server?  Or is it a feature of
the 'simple' in ssmtp?

Couldn't find any answers in the Cygwin 
mailing list archives.  Has anyone else
experienced this?  Thanks.

Bob Heckel

-----------------------------------------------------
Protect yourself from spam, use http://sneakemail.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019