delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <134651813.1015436268986.JavaMail.root@boots> |
Date: | 06 Mar 2002 12:28:39 -0000 |
From: | "Bob Heckel" <fgi6vbcc1tcd001 AT sneakemail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Blind carbon copy not blind (mutt ssmtp) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Note-from-DJ: | This may be spam |
I've noticed unusual behavior using Cygwin mutt-1.2.5i-6 and ssmtp-2.38.7-3 that doesn't occur in standard Unix mutt/sendmail usage. If I Bcc: someone, the entire Bcc: line appears buried in the headers of the recipient's email (and of course the blind recipients are not hidden, just made harder to find). Is this a problem with the way ssmtp is passing Bcc: addresses to my ISP's (AT&T) SMTP server? Or is it a feature of the 'simple' in ssmtp? Couldn't find any answers in the Cygwin mailing list archives. Has anyone else experienced this? Thanks. Bob Heckel ----------------------------------------------------- Protect yourself from spam, use http://sneakemail.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |