Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C84D98B.EE57234A@lapo.it>
Date:	Tue, 05 Mar 2002 15:43:23 +0100
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: sshd useful on cygwin???
References:	<ELEAKPMDEEKOMPLEKACBOENBCOAA DOT erik AT vigmostad DOT com> <3C83CA21 DOT 7E0959B9 AT lapo DOT it> <20020305101825 DOT O13590 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C84A002 DOT 936FE893 AT lapo DOT it> <20020305115652 DOT U13590 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C84AC49 DOT BCFA1628 AT lapo DOT it> <20020305134845 DOT W13590 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>

> Just for clearness... you already know that you can use public key
> authentication with sshd, don't you?

I quite tought (and that were true at least at the time of that message) that pubkey auth
worked only if daemon was started with the right user rights, but not starting it as system.

Am I wrong? Is that already "in"?
It seems that with -vv I always get "Server refused our key."

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -