delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Corinna, On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Could you comment as to whether or not the above changes would have any > > positive affects on the following? > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00628.html > > No. The above change is sort of a code cleanup. I don't know how > we could workaround that Winsock problem in Cygwin. It doesn't know > from where you got the `n' parameter and it's perfectly legal for > a read() call to return a number of bytes < n. The above is what I thought. I appreciate you confirming this. I guess it is time for me to clean up my patch and submit it to fetchmail CVS for consideration... Thanks, Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |