Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/03/05/04:21:37
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Corinna,
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0000, Rui Carmo wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:47:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > > I was under the impression that recv() bugs had been twiddled in
> > > > 1.3.10... Or did the changes in recv() not address MSG_PEEK?
> > >
> > > Hmm, I will look into this. It would be great if my patch just became
> > > obsolete.
> >
> > The release notes (post by Cristopher:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg01350.html) mention recv()
> > explicitly:
> >
> > > - Implement socket read/write using recv/send. (corinna)
> >
> > Bit vague, though, so I don't know if Corinna tackled the MSG_PEEK
> > issue.
>
> Could you comment as to whether or not the above changes would have any
> positive affects on the following?
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00628.html
No. The above change is sort of a code cleanup. I don't know how
we could workaround that Winsock problem in Cygwin. It doesn't know
from where you got the `n' parameter and it's perfectly legal for
a read() call to return a number of bytes < n.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -