Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Subject:	RE: setup.exe (cinstall) bugfixes + minor new feature
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:29:25 +1100
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008AB08@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic:	setup.exe (cinstall) bugfixes + minor new feature
Thread-Index:	AcHDfWfSRiH4BRdGQT2sEl3h4Riw9gAApl3w
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g24DaEf07963

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:maxb AT ukf DOT net] 
> 
> 
> > I was thinking that
> > If the setting is absent it prompts,
> > if the setting is on it always creates, overwriting the 
> current one if 
> > the setting is off it never creates.
> 
> > Rob
> 
> Hmm - I'm not sure I understand this.
> 
> Current behaviour is that setup checks the boxes by default, 
> if it does not find the shortcuts. The user can manually 
> check the boxes to run the creation code even if they already 
> exist. I find it mildly annoying to have to uncheck both 
> boxes each time I run setup. (My desktop shortcut is called 
> something different, and I don't want a start menu one) 
> Therefore, I would like setup to remember the fact that the 
> user has deliberately unchecked the boxes. I don't understand 
> why anyone would want the shortcuts deleted and recreated 
> every time the run setup?

I can think of reasons :}. The first one being that as a sysadmin I
might want to force every user to get shortcuts - without being
prompted. Now a shared cygwin install does not imply shared profiles -
desktop and start menu locations - so the ability to turn off the prompt
and always create is thus useful.
 
> I will proceed with fixing that bug, and investigate the use 
> of a setup.conf file. Are there any objections to using 
> windows {Get,Set}PrivateProfileInt API calls? Or should I 
> investigate the setup.ini parsing code, and try to use that?

Neither :}. I've a model in mind for persistence for all the currently
diverse setup options. Seriously though, for now, code it with
Get|Set... And I'll get my model documented and into code at some point.

Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -