Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 3 Mar 2002 09:31:46 +0000
Message-ID:	<9450-Sun03Mar2002093146+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 7.00 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: "start" for Cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<F8268126BF427A409936A83B6B863387050B4596@red-msg-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References:	<F8268126BF427A409936A83B6B863387050B4596 AT red-msg-01 DOT redmond DOT corp DOT microsoft DOT com>

On Saturday 2 Mar 02, Stephan Mueller writes:
> Note though, that on Win9x, start is a standalone file (I forget if it's
> start.exe or start.com) on the path.
> Cygwin still supports 9x, so fears about consternation in some quarters
> still apply (it's just that they're different quarters than Charles
> originally had in mind :-)

I use Win9x, and I don't think it's a problem for the cygutils package
to introduce /usr/bin/start.  People who install the cygutils package
can probably figure out what's going on.

My opinion, anyway.

David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -