Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 2 Mar 2002 22:12:20 +0000
From:	Rui Carmo <rui DOT carmo AT accao DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: fetchmail 5.9.8 and maildrop 1.3.7
Message-ID:	<20020302221220.A4040@LOKI>
References:	<20020302004512 DOT A1936 AT LOKI> <20020302160332 DOT GA1976 AT hp DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20020302160332.GA1976@hp.com>; from jason@tishler.net on Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 11:03:32AM -0500
X-Operating-System:	CYGWIN_NT-5.1 LOKI 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown
X-Location:	loki.no-ip.org
X-URL:	http://na-cama.com/rcarmo
X-Submliminal-Message:	Don't Panic. There are trained professionals to do it for you.
X-Return-Path:	rui DOT carmo AT accao DOT net
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Jason,

On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 11:03:32AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> If you run under Win2K (and possibly WinXP), you may want to see the
> following to save yourself some grief:
> 
>     http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00628.html
> 
> However, so far no one else seems to have noticed this problem.

I was under the impression that recv() bugs had been twiddled in 1.3.10... Or did the changes in recv() not address MSG_PEEK?

I did not notice any corruption issues with my fetchmail build - but then, I did not transfer much more than a few megs of mail (around 25MB, I think).

> If you are having problems with maildrop, then I suggest trying procmail.
> I have been using the fetchmail/procmail/mutt combination very successfully
> under Cygwin for some time now.

Well, the reason I tried maildrop was that, after searching the mailing list (and I do recall finding the message you refer to, for instance), I found that you had to install BIND to build procmail. I also like the Courier suite, and intend to have a go at it later. :)

I'm also not entirely sure that fetchmail is not the one inserting (or handing over, or whatever) the extra blank line upon mailbox creation (appends work fine...). I'll have to check later.

Anyway, if you've been using fetchmail + procmail since September, what's keeping it from being added to the packages list? :) Is it the BIND issue?

(I'd be glad to lend a hand, mind you...)

Rui Carmo



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -