Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 1 Mar 2002 12:59:42 +0000
Message-ID:	<7840-Fri01Mar2002125942+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer:	emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
In-Reply-To:	<4.3.1.2.20020228173048.024373c8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
References:	<570DA4A1BC7DD4119AD7000629551498013E10E1 AT pjmnt11 DOT pjm DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020228173048 DOT 024373c8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

On Thursday 28 Feb 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this 
> FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
> the then released versions of Windows?

Larry,

I don't understand what's wrong with the current FAQ entry.  Maybe I
misunderstand the question?

Thanks,
David



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -