Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20020228173048.024373c8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:47:13 -0500
To:	jonesr AT pjm DOT com
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<570DA4A1BC7DD4119AD7000629551498013E10E1@pjmnt11.pjm.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Yes.  The Cywgin DLL has always gone to great lengths to support all released
versions of Windows, other than CE.  Other than the obvious caveats noted in
the FAQ entry which I referred you to, it's safe to assume nothing more or
less.  Historically, the Cygwin DLL has 'worked' with whatever Windows 
versions were current at the time.  This has certainly been true for the 
last 5+ years conservatively.  No need to fret.

It's worth noting, however, that this list only really "supports" the 
current release of Cygwin.  So if you have an issue with 1.3.2 that you 
want to post, the response you're likely to get is 'does it work with 
1.3.10?'

David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this 
FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
the then released versions of Windows?

  
Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX



At 05:31 PM 2/28/2002, jonesr AT pjm DOT com wrote:
>I did prior to my e-mail & interpreted to mean applicability to the 1.3.9 DLL.
>Can I presume that FAQ item applies to all DLL versions, just to 1.3.9, or to
>the 1.3.* family?
>
>Bob J.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall AT rfk DOT com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:21 PM
>To: jonesr AT pjm DOT com; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Subject: Re: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
>
>
>At 05:20 PM 2/28/2002, jonesr AT pjm DOT com wrote:
>
>
> >Bob Jones
> >Decision Support Analyst
> >Settlements, Planning, & Corporate Services Dept.
> >PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
> >(610) 666-8954
> >jonesr AT pjm DOT com
> >
> >"Omnia apud me mathematica fiunt."
> >(With me everything turns into mathematics.)
> >-- Rene Descartes
>
>
>Look to the FAQ for these kinds of questions:
>
>What versions of Windows are supported?
>http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_1.html#SEC2
>
>
>Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
>RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
>838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
>Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -