Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/02/26/05:37:44
I'm using Cygwin make-3.79.1-5 on a largeish project. While we're
not using .d files we do have a lot of dependecies spread across
several makefiles that get included by other makefiles. I'm trying
to see if we're affected by this problem as startup takes longer than
I would have thought it should do, guessing from when I last used make
on a largish project a couple of years back. So I tried the MinGW
precompiled make but it's actually slower than the Cygwin one (and
works slightly differently - $(shell find -iname \*.wav) fails).
How much improvement have you noticed with the FSF one?
Can you tell me where to get a precompiled binary of it?
Thanks,
Mark.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Segrave (x3254) [mailto:jsegrave AT itdesign DOT ie]
Sent: 25 February 2002 10:50
To: 'Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)'
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: Make 3.79.1 - dependency checking & previous versions
Larry - thanks for those files. I think we have our issue sorted: when
we use the FSF win32 port of make 3.79.1, dependency checking works fine
- when we use the cygwin port of make 3.79.1, it doesn't.
For the moment we can get away with using the FSF port, but as soon as I
get time I'll try to track down where the cygwin problem originated.
Thanks again,
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall AT rfk DOT com]
> Sent: 21 February 2002 16:12
> To: jsegrave AT itdesign DOT ie
> Subject: RE: Make 3.79.1 - dependency checking & previous versions
>
>
> At 11:01 AM 2/21/2002, you wrote:
> > > >I'd really appreciate it if I could get some of those
> packages from
> > > >you. Can you put them online anywhere?
> >
> > > I can email them if you want. Contact me off-list with the
> > > packages you'd like and I'll send you what I have.
> >
> >I'm mostly interested in trying to get a make that is close
> to 3.79.1,
> >but doesn't have the dependency checking problem. So 3.79.3-4 is
> >probably the one to check first. Failing that, I'd like to
> try 3.79-3
> >to see if the problem existed that far back. I have an interest in
> >getting 3.79.1-2 and 3.79.1-1, but that's just curiosity, I
> don't need
> >them yet :) If you can send me any of these versions, I'd really
> >appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Here they are.
>
> Enjoy! ;-)
>
>
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -