Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B215B@wilber.adroit.com>
From:	"Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To:	"'Sturm Volker'" <Volker DOT Sturm AT fthw DOT siemens DOT de>,
	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'"
	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Binary size
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:49:40 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

  I get similar results.  However, the stripped versions are the same size.
Apparently the new compiler includes more debugging information.  I haven't
yet found  any documentation describing this but I've barely looked.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sturm Volker [mailto:Volker DOT Sturm AT fthw DOT siemens DOT de]
> Subject: WG: Binary size
> > I tried out cygwin on win2k and i compiled gcc3.0.3 - apart from the
> > prefix option - in the standard way. using the gcc 2.95 that came with
> > cygwin and the 3.0.3 gave me a size of some compiled .exe of about 18 k
> > with the old version and 35 k with the new version. the program i
> > compiled for testing was:
> > 
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > 
> > int main(int argc, char** argv) {
> > 	printf("Hello world!\n");
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > I used 'gcc -o myfirst myfirst.cpp' for both compiler versions. why is
> > the big difference in size?
 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -