Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is:	Volker DOT Sturm AT fthw DOT siemens DOT de (at relayer lizzard.sbs.de)
Message-ID:	<6DE0BA6EB6AED211A40440005A42218C0216401A@fthw340a.fthw.siemens.de>
From:	Sturm Volker <Volker DOT Sturm AT fthw DOT siemens DOT de>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	WG: Binary size
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:02:18 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

> Hi,
> I tried out cygwin on win2k and i compiled gcc3.0.3 - apart from the
> prefix option - in the standard way. using the gcc 2.95 that came with
> cygwin and the 3.0.3 gave me a size of some compiled .exe of about 18 k
> with the old version and 35 k with the new version. the program i
> compiled for testing was:
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> int main(int argc, char** argv) {
> 	printf("Hello world!\n");
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> I used 'gcc -o myfirst myfirst.cpp' for both compiler versions. why is
> the big difference in size?
> 
> Regards,
> Volker Sturm
> 
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -