Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C73F7CF.7070205@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:23:59 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Peter Ring <pri AT magnus DOT dk>
CC:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ghostscript-6.51-3
References:	<ADF57C3C368ED411803C00508BCDF1A559C85E AT cddkmail DOT cph DOT magnus DOT local>

Peter Ring wrote:

> Please forgive a silly question.
> 
> I've rebuild the previous release (ghostscript-6.51-1) with X support
> (mainly for use with xdvik in order to view dvi's with postscript 
> illustrations).
> 
> While this were not a major hassle (just patch src/unix-gcc.mak a little, 
> don't forget to set XLIBS=Xt SM ICE Xext X11), are there any reason not 
> to release X-enabled binaries for ghostscript? Will gs then not run 
> without the X runtime libraries?


Nope. If you link it against the X libraries, but then try to run it on 
a system that doesn't have those DLLs installed, you'll get "Couldn't 
find dynamic link library "libXFOO.dll" in {path...}" errors.

ghostscript can't be distributed in X-linked form until the cygwin-xfree 
guys create a setup-installable set of X packages.  (And perhaps, not 
even then; it's up to Dario)

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -