Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/02/20/10:51:50
I use tho most recent 1.3.9. You are probably using another
version of Windows. I did several tests and discovered different
action depending on Windows version:
Win 95/98/ME - fails (signal never received)
Win NT4 - OK (signal is serviced)
Is it bug in Cygwin or bug/misconfiguration of Windows ?
Piotr Stepien, ASP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:46 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: recvfrom and timeout signal
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Piotr St?pie? wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I try to implement timeout for recvfrom:
> >
> > struct sigaction action;
> > action.sa_handler = alarm_signal;
> > action.sa_flags = 0;
> > sigemptyset(&(action.sa_mask)); /* ignore all known signals */
> > sigaction(SIGALRM,&action,NULL); /* ensures that SA_RESTART is NOT set */
> >
> > alarm(TIMEOUT);
> > int st=recvfrom(sockfd,buff,sizeof(buff),0,(sockaddr*)&srv_addr,&sz);
> > if(st == -1){
> > if(errno==EINTR){
> > /* timeout */
> > }else{
> > alarm(0); /* reset alarm */
> > }
> > }
> >
> > but the process is never woken by SIGALRM when no packet is received.
> > The recvfrom waits forever.
> >
> > Has anybody an idea what can be wrong ?
>
> Are you using an old version of Cygwin? Your test application
> works well on Cygwin 1.3.9.
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -