Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	MIME::Lite 2.117 (F2.6; T0.14; A1.42; B2.12; Q2.03)
Date:	Sat, 9 Feb 2002 07:49:31 +0000
From:	"Soren Andersen" <soren_andersen AT fastmail DOT fm>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	soren_andersen AT fastmail DOT fm
X-Epoch:	1013240971
X-Sasl-enc:	C7fqFPsIRE2eozkIhZ4vSQ
Subject:	Close to libiconv now?
Message-Id:	<20020209074931.C5F44394099@fastmail.fm>

Hello,

With the newest autotools in the official Cygwin packages, are we now
close to being able to build gnu libiconv o-o-b?

I am trying to build gcc-3.0.3 and it suggests that i might want to
install libiconv. I understand from reading list archives that Chuck
Wilson built an experimental libiconv using some hacked autotools
support, last july. Any updates on that topic?

 Regards,
    Soren Andersen

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -