| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de> |
| To: | "cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Subject: | RE: /proc (was: Re: /dev/registry) |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:22:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <000a01c1af08$e61cf0a0$01000001@BRAMSCHE> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 |
| Importance: | Normal |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
| In-Reply-To: | <014c01c1af04$47343ba0$0100a8c0@advent02> |
>
> > Why can't this /dev/registry stuff be just an ioctl()? Open the
> > /dev/registry node for the appropriate access, then use some ioctl()'s to
> > read and write it. Put the /dev/null entry points for the read and write
> > handlers for /dev/registry and you won't have that accidental corruption
> > from cat.
> >
> > By the way, if you're using Cygwin, why can't you just call
> RegQueryValueExW
> > and friends yourself? You're a Win32 process anyway, and no UNIX has such
> a
> > thing - don't care about portability.
> 1. it's difficult to accidentally cat to a key considering the length of the
> names -
> /proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/S
> hell\ Extensions/Approved/\{BDEADF00-C265-11d0-BCED-00A0C90AB50F\} is a bit
> hard to type in by accident...
> 2. it makes scripting easier
> 3. ** adding /proc/registry means adding /proc and once a /proc virtual fs
> is established, other /proc entries can be added a lot more easily
This seems good to me :-)
> 4. it gives you an alternative to regedit and friends
> I almost have a read-only version of this working. I don't see why their
> should be objections to this since you can't screw your registry up in any
> way. I'll think about how to add write capabilities later.
> I'll probably add some entries to /proc - ones commonly found on UNIX
> platforms maybe. Anyone have any favourites they wish to see?
>
> Regards
> Chris
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |