Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:01:48 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Scriptable start.exe
Message-ID:	<20020206040148.GF12007@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<B885BE24.2FCE%jannino AT jannino DOT com> <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKOECKCKAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKOECKCKAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:55:04PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> So I am wondering what the state of making start.exe scriptable is?  This is
>> a feature that would be quite helpful on a current project so that clients
>> can install a properly configured cygwin without the few clicks that are
>> required now.
>
>None of the people that have been working on setup.exe recently (including
>myself) appear to have any desire to add any scripting functionality to it.
>There's much more important work that needs to be done before such a notion
>could even be realistically considered.

Currently, setup.exe is simple enough that you could almost get by with
just using shell scripts, tar, and bzip2.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -