Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/02/04/10:58:50
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf
> Of Charles Wilson
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:30 AM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libtool-devel-20020202-1
>
>
> Note: In libtool CVS, a decision was made to rescind the previous
> "-no-undefined" default. (Reason: if a libraries objects DID have an
> undefined symbol, then not even a static lib would be built, on cygwin.)
> This is all related to the MLB restructuring, I think.
>
> Anyway, this means that you need to add '-no-undefined' to your
> libfoo_la_LDFLAGS line in Makefile.am, or be sure to call libtool
> yourself using the -no-undefined flag.
>
> P.S. Ralf -- give this version a shot, and see if it fixes your problems
> with C++ DLLs.
Charles, thanks for thsi great work, I will try it. :-)
> --Chuck
>
>
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > The 'libtool-devel' package has been updated to 20020202-1.
> > It contains a hacked version of libtool(from CVS 02-Feb-2002),
> > installed into /usr/autotool/devel/*. Basically, this is a
> > forward port of the hacks from the previous, 20010531 release
> > to current libtool CVS HEAD.
> >
> > The good news: this version passes the "dry-run" test that
> > the previous one failed. It adds no new selftest failures --
> > AND it passes the new C++ libtool testsuite. So, it should
> > help to solve the problems the 20010531 version had with C++
> > code. (I've used to it build the C++ 'libplotter' library from
> > GNU plotutils.)
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -