Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<109f01c1aa92$5a78fc30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020131042428 DOT GB5472 AT redhat DOT com> <006801c1aa8d$16104440$01000001 AT BRAMSCHE> <20020131195823 DOT GM7966 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: A real fork() on NT
Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:03:28 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	31 Jan 2002 20:03:17.0503 (UTC) FILETIME=[52D9B0F0:01C1AA92]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> What about someone actually familiarizing themselves with how Cygwin
> does things currently?  Then they can make some informed suggestions.

I don't like that idea, it might lead to less noise, more signal and
some good ideas.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -