Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:58:23 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: A real fork() on NT
Message-ID:	<20020131195823.GM7966@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020131042428 DOT GB5472 AT redhat DOT com> <006801c1aa8d$16104440$01000001 AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<006801c1aa8d$16104440$01000001@BRAMSCHE>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 08:25:47PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>>On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:50:45PM -0800, Barubary wrote:
>>>Do you have any idea how to compile a program for the win32 POSIX
>>>system?  If we could reverse engineer a win32 POSIX program that uses
>>>fork(), we could see the raw NT commands to do it.
>>
>>Corinna already provided a reference which provided you with a sample
>>of a Windows NT version of fork.
>>
>>Just buy the book and you're all set.
>>
>What about this approach using threads
>http://www.xav.com/perl/lib/Pod/perlfork.html

Given all of the caveats at that page, it's hard to understand how it
could be a general solution.

What about someone actually familiarizing themselves with how Cygwin
does things currently?  Then they can make some informed suggestions.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -