Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<001801c1aa0a$79b4a000$a7eb0544@CX535256D>
From:	"Barubary" <barubary AT cox DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<006e01c1a96a$f60429a0$aace0544 AT CX535256D> <E16VsW4-0001P8-00 AT diver DOT doc DOT ic DOT ac DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: A real fork() on NT
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:50:45 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Do you have any idea how to compile a program for the win32 POSIX system?
If we could reverse engineer a win32 POSIX program that uses fork(), we
could see the raw NT commands to do it.

-- Barubary

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher January" <ccj00 AT doc DOT ic DOT ac DOT uk>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT


> Coincidentally, I was looking into a similar thing myself. Windows NT has
a
> POSIX subsystem that's capable of doing fork()'s so it is obviously
possible.
> Have you any ideas of the arguments passed to the function or what it
returns?



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -