Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<F66469FCE9C5D311B8FF0000F8FE9E070F511096@mbtlipnt03.btlabs.bt.co.uk>
From:	hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com
To:	robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au, janneke AT gnu DOT org
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:21:20 -0000
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
MIME-version:	1.0

Well, I *did* skip the libpng update... I think the reason
(hind-sight) was that I don't expect teTeX to depend on
libpng, (and to be honest, I always go via the ps/ghostscript
route to pdf and I don't use pdftex myself, as the last
time I use it it didn't support even eps graphics; and pdftex
is a relatively new inclusion to teTeX) and another 
reason was I have a custom compiled
xv which I uses quite often, and it obviously depends 
on libpng and I would rather not break it.

By the way, the installation of teTeX still finishes -
it is only during the post-install script stage
("texconfig all"?) that you get a lot of messages flashing 
by, and some of which is related to not being able to run pdftex
and families; but the script does go all the way to completion
and you would miss those messages if you are not reading it.
The only obvious indication that something is missing is
that the end of the post-install script, a window pops up
saying "missing import ... ". 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au]
Sent: 30 January 2002 09:30
To: hin-tak.leung; Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: cygwin
Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
> > BTW - pdftex in tetex-20001208-4 depends on the
> > new (10-days-old) libpng 1.0.2.
>
> Hmm, that's not good.  Does that package have a new name?  Otherwise
> we're in dire need of versioned depends.

I wouldn't describe it as dire - only folk updating can get the new tex
stuff, and there's no reason for them to skip png.

Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -